Here is my latest Mind and Matter column in the Wall
Street Journal
There are many mysteries about Ray, the 17-year-old
English-speaking "forest boy" who walked into the city hall in
Berlin on Sept. 5, claiming to have lived wild in the woods for
five years with his father-until his father recently died in a
fall. Judging by his rucksack and his speech, he was not a fully
feral child, reared by wild animals and unacquainted with
language.
![[RIDLEY raise]](http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/RV-AE391_RIDLEY_DV_20110923183349.jpg)
Leo
Acadio
![]()
Among many legends, from Romulus to Mowgli, only one feral child
from the woods might be genuine. Victor, the wild boy of Aveyron in
France, who was discovered in 1800, was believed at the time by
Jean-Marc-Gaspard Itard, the medical student who took him in, to
have "lived in an absolute solitude from his fourth or fifth almost
to his 12th year." Yet despite Itard's efforts, Victor never
learned to speak, and Itard eventually gave up and "abandoned my
student to incurable dumbness."
![]()
But there are urban equivalents. In 1828, the year Victor died,
Kaspar Hauser was found in Nuremberg, Germany. He had apparently
lived not in the forest but in a dark room with virtually no human
contact for his 16 years. Like Victor, he adjusted to most things,
but not to speech. Even after years of coaching, his syntax was "in
a state of miserable confusion." The filmmakers François Truffaut
and Werner Herzog turned the stories of Victor and Hauser,
respectively, into striking fables.
![]()
In 1971, a 13-year-old girl named Genie was found in Los Angeles
after a childhood of painful deprivation. The daughter of a blind
mother and an abusive father, she had been kept in silence in a
single room, mostly either tied to a chair or caged. She was
deformed, incontinent and mostly mute. Her only words were "stopit"
and "nomore." Although she improved rapidly and developed a good
vocabulary, elementary grammar and syntax remained beyond her
reach.
![]()
All of these cases, if they are genuine, reinforce the view that
language must be learned within a critical window of time during
youth, or it will be too late. Experiments with song birds reach
the same conclusion: If deprived of the sound of adult song at a
particular age, young finches are never able to learn to sing their
species' song. (The research, incidentally, was called the Kaspar
Hauser experiments.)
![[RIDLEY raise]](http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/RV-AE392_RIDLEY_DV_20110923183552.jpg)
Leo
Acadio
![]()
A neat, natural test of the critical-window theory is provided
by pidgin languages-borrowed vocabularies usually spoken by traders
in a foreign land. Pidgins generally lack rules of
grammar-inflection at the end of words or schemes of word order.
They evolve into creoles, which are grammatical, once they've been
learned by children. Children seem capable of imposing grammar on
to vocabulary.
![]()
In one remarkable case, in Nicaragua in 1979, creating a new
school for the deaf led to the development, by the children, of a
new sign language. It seems that young brains can do something old
brains cannot do, in terms of mastering grammar and syntax. Witness
the relative ease with which children learn foreign tongues.
![]()
The actual molecular mechanism by which these critical windows
or "sensitive periods" of mental plasticity open and close is
slowly becoming clear. In mice, lowering the production of the
neurotransmitter GABA prevents the start of a sensitive period in
which the visual system develops. By contrast, giving the mice
benzodiazepines, which mimic GABA, brings on a precociously early
sensitive period.
![]()
Interestingly, there is evidence that parts of the GABA system
are often disturbed in people with autism. But which way: up or
down? Autistic children often have high GABA levels, yet the brains
of autistic people, postmortem, often have low levels of
GABA-making enzymes. Some scientists now think that autism results
when a critical window of brain plasticity opens either too early
or too late.
These findings are prime evidence of how nature and
nurture work together rather than in opposition to each other. The
brain is innately designed to be open to experience, but only
during a certain period. I like to call it "nature via
nurture."
![]()